In politics it’s always the other side’s fault. They wouldn’t go along and so ‘gosh-we-really-wanted-to-do-it-but-look-at-what-we-had-to-contend-with.’ Texas RINOs won’t have this fig leaf to cover their spinelessness in the 2011 session. With a super-majority of over two thirds in the House there will be no excuse to compromise principles. And what principles are being put forth!
Representative-elect James White (R-Woodville) has made clear his intentions to fight unfunded mandates to help close the budget shortfall. The East Texas educator and rancher shocked the Austin elites when he overwhelmingly defeated incumbent Jim McReynolds who had long enjoyed bi-partisan support in his district. While early nay-sayers clucked that an African-American could never win in East Texas let alone against a popular legislator like McReynolds, White upset conventional wisdom with a stunning 16 point victory; and he isn’t wasting any time:
Preparing for the next legislative session, I am working on a number of bills to nullify unconstitutional federal actions that intrude on our freedoms to make health choices, raise cattle, and responsibly use our divinely blessed resources. In particular, I will support legislation, such as State Representative Leo Berman’s (Tyler) bill that nullifies nationalized health care in Texas. Furthermore, my efforts to restore constitutional government will extend to abuses performed by the state government in the form of unfunded mandates on our local governments and school districts. Where liberty flourishes, prosperity thrives and this begins by restraining government within its constitutional bounds. (source)
Speaking of Berman, he is out at the head of the nullification movement as detailed in our earlier post here, and he also happens to be another East Texas legislator. Is there something in the water? As if that weren’t enough, White also campaigned openly- against the advice of numerous Republicans – on abolishing the property tax. “Stop renting our homes from the government” his Issues link proclaims.
East Texas seems to be mounting a revolt against the old guard in Austin. White joined incoming freshman Erwin Cain (R-Como) several weeks ago to announce their support for the underdog Ken Paxton as Speaker of the House. With all indications still pointing to an easy Straus victory, White and Cain stuck to their principles and cast their lot in with the candidate for whom their constituents were clamoring. They are now joined by reps Berman, Hughes, Christian, and Flynn; all also of East Texas.
With freshmen like White and Cain in the midst of veteran legislators Bryan Hughes, Leo Berman, Wayne Christian, and Dan Flynn, East Texas is setting the bar awfully high for the rest of the Lone Star State. Maybe that’s why the goofiest rumor running around Austin this week is that numerous incoming Freshmen including James White are shocked that they don’t receive Congressional-level pay. I can personally attest to the falsity of this claim, having spoken on multiple occasions as far back as a year ago with James White regarding his concerns about making ends meet on the nominal $600 or so per month legislators receive. Combined with the alleged threats by Straus operatives to draw Erwin Cain and others out of a district if they didn’t support the former Speaker, it looks like the machine is gearing up to devour those who refuse to march lock-step with the big-government program.
This may be the session which bursts the Texas Liberty Bubble I previously described and begins the tough work of rolling back government to allow genuine freedom to flourish once again. If it isn’t we will have the GOP Old Guard to blame. There is a fire in the hearts of some veteran legislators which I believe has been stoked by the election of so many strong ideologues for Liberty. Unfortunately there is a tsunami of good ol’ boys determined to extinguish any real reform but this time around they will be easy to identify. Our task will be to pay attention, take note, never forget, and be sure the voters in their districts never forget either.
2010 was just a warm-up. Republicans should be aware that they have been given just enough rope to hang themselves and behave in all things accordingly.
Despite an outpouring of protest from the very grassroots that just weeks ago delivered the biggest Republican advantage since Reconstruction, the word is that Joe Straus is still likely to continue his reign as Speaker.
Sources in Austin are giving him a 75% chance of retaining his seat of power, although it is possible there will be an exodus of supporters next week when the time limit for fund-raising expires in advance of the next session. The fact is Straus is popular with the lobbyists (which should tell you something) and many legislators may be remaining on his side until the last check is able to be written on December 11. My advice? December 12th be burning up the phone lines!
Then there are those like Stafani Carter, who is claiming it is simply a matter of honor that she stand by her pledge to support Straus; a pledge made all the way back at the primaries and concealed from the grassroots that helped put her in office. That anyone should believe it dishonorable to withdraw support from Straus in spite of the outcry of their constituents is ironic considering Straus himself was still on a pledge card supporting his own predecessor the day before taking his place.
In East Texas, two of the incoming Freshmen, Representatives-Elect James White (R-Hillister) and Erwin Cain (R-Como) issued a joint Press Release detailing their determination to support Paxton based on the overwhelming call for a new direction coming from their constituents.
The ‘Old Guard’ in Austin is supposedly sneering that these Freshmen are “caving to pressure” and I questioned White about this specific charge. The Tea Party Republican, who won 58-42% unseating a 13-year incumbent (a popular Democrat with strong favorables among voters from both parties) replied, “It’s caving to pressure when an elected representative does what some lobbyist wants in spite of his people; this is not caving to pressure, this is me representing my District.”
Well said.
While not everyone is persuadable, the following is a list of either ‘soft’ supporters of Straus or those who have made no pledge at all. These are considered prime targets for movement and the list has already paid off. Last week Representative Van Taylor was on it, now he is committed to supporting Ken Paxton.
Stefani Carter
member elect of Dallas (972) 385-3313
Charles Schwertner
member elect of Georgetown (512) 863-4563
John Frullo
member elect of Lubbock 806-853-8275
Larry Gonzales
member elect of Round Rock 512-244-1280
Sarah Davis
member elect of Houston 713-320-2077
Linda Harper-Brown
incumbent of Irving (972) 717-2871
Kelly Hancock
(HD-91): (512) 463-0599, (817) 590-9280
Larry Taylor
(HD-24): (512) 463-0729, (281) 338-0924
Jerry Madden
(HD-67): (512) 463-0544, (972) 424-2235
Barbara Nash
(HD 93rd) bnash1@aol.com barbara@barbaranashfortexas.com
Rob Orr
(capital 512-463-0538)(capital fax 512-463-0897) (district 817-295-5158)(district fax 817-295-5319)
Mark Shelton
(capital 521-463-0608)
(capital fax 512-463-8342)
(district 817-921-6554)
George Lavender Texarkana, TX
(903) 838-7348
(870) 773-4631
Lance Gooden
member elect of Terrell
(903) 386-1276 campaign@lancegooden.com
Marva Beck
member elect of District 57 South Waco
( 903 )536-2290
Jason Isaac
East of Austin (512) 850-5524
Walter T “Four” Price (Not a Joke)
87th District in west Texas (806) 322-1440
Dan Huberty
Member elect of District 127 Houston (713)526-3399


Posted by Erick Erickson (Profile)Monday, November 15th at 1:37PM EST
It has always bothered me when conservatives win elections but “moderate” Republicans end up running the leadership. In case you haven’t noticed, it happens all the time – once behind closed doors, the leadership does not reflect the elected Members nor the people who elected them. It is time for that to change and one place to start is Texas.
For those of you unfamiliar with what’s going on, there is a fight going on over the next Speaker of the Texas House. It really boils down to two choices: the current Speaker, moderate and Democrat supported Joe Straus, and conservative Ken Paxton.
As arguably the most powerful figure in Texas politics during the legislative session, the Speaker appoints Committee Chairs and those chairs set the agenda. As a result, liberal chairmen can keep conservative reforms from being voted on. This is exactly what happened the last legislative session when Speaker of the House Joe Straus swept into the Speaker slot on the backs of 65 Democrats and 11 Republicans (infamously known as the “Straus Eleven”). Yes, you read that correctly. A Republican Speaker that only had 11 Republicans vote for him. The reward for the Democrats loyalty was handing 14 committee chairmanships to liberal Democrats out of the 32.
These weren’t just any committees either. Democrat Rene Oliveira chaired the Texas House Ways and Means Committee in the 81st Texas legislature. On top of that, Straus handed the Chair of Calendars to Brian McCall – one of the most liberal Republicans in the Texas House, having received a rating of 27% from the Young Conservatives of Texas. The Chair of Calendars is the second most powerful leadership position in the Texas House because he sets the legislative calendar. If you want to kill conservative legislation, put a liberal in as the Chair of Calendars.
But it gets worse. During the 81st legislative session, Straus and his lieutenants burned conservative Texans over and over again.
Straus was recently given a 100% rating from NARAL in Texas and was honored by Planned Parenthood (where his wife sits on the board). He stumped for the poster child of the Left in Texas, Democrat Patrick Rose, this fall while not giving one dime to Republican challengers across the state. The ironic twist in all that is 22 Republican challengers won, including Jason Isaac, Patrick Rose’s opponent.
Possibly one of the most damning pieces of information against Straus is the percentage of Republican bills that were killed under his “leadership”-32%. 32% of Republican bills killed under a Republican Speaker while only 3% of the Democrat bills were killed. Elections have consequences. At least they should. Under former Republican Speaker, Tom Craddick, almost 50% of Democrat bills were defeated in final votes compared to 4% of Republican bills.
On Empower Texans Fiscal Index, the committee chairmen Straus appointed had an average rating on the Fiscal Index of 54%, abysmal by any standard.
Ken Paxton, on the other hand, received a 100% rating from Empower Texans. In contrast to Straus, he received a 0% rating from NARAL, a 97% rating from the Young Conservatives of Texas and an A+ from the NRA. Rock solid, you say? It gets better. Paxton sponsored legislation that would create stronger spending limits in Texas government in 2005, 2007 and 2009 and was lead author on cutting-edge transparency legislation in 2007.
What is troubling to me, though, is to see newly elected Republicans like Stef Carter and Cindy Burkett and a rock solid conservative like Sid Miller amongst others endorse Straus right out of the gate and now that Paxton is in the race for Speaker, refuse to withdraw their endorsements.
This race already has some controversy. Last week Bryan Hughes (R) of Mineola voiced his opposition to Straus after he was threatened by an unnamed member of the Speaker’s leadership team. Representative Leo Berman filed an ethics complaint, tainting Straus pledge cards with the specter of bribery.
The Texas Speaker Race will provide an early preview of the consequences for betraying the conservative grassroots coalition that rocked the November 2nd vote. The 2012 primary season is not that far away.
With a host of issue before the next legislative session, with redistricting taking place and Texas in line to get another 4 seats in the United States House of Representatives, the question must be asked: who should be in charge of this process? Straus? Or Paxton?
The answer is clear.
With three men currently to choose from in the Speaker’s race, we in the grassroots need to prepare to rally behind that candidate who will best advance the agenda of liberty and conservatism. Interestingly, these two pursuits rarely appear in the same legislator. Instead we get a Warren Chisum who is very socially conservative, but seems to want to spend a lot of our money making other people be socially conservative. Most famously (and embarrassingly) Representative Chisum managed to make such an issue of fake penises that an independent film has been made about his crusade to outlaw dildos. However you feel about rubber ding-dongs and their place in our society, I am confident any fiscal conservative would agree that we don’t need to spend any tax money eradicating the blight of pretend penises.
So with Representative Chisum we get a 2009 rating of 100% from the Heritage Alliance on Social Issues, but the same group gives him a pathetic 73% on Economic Issues and the Young Conservatives of Texas gave him only an overall rating of 76%. Being three-quarters conservative won’t cut it! That kind of wishy-washy conservatism is what got us a $20 Billion shortfall in Texas. We can’t have it both ways, freedom and regulating sex toys for our citizens; small government and the legal framework to monitor the purchase and distribution of plastic genitalia.
Straus’s record cannot possibly excuse his behavior in the bid for his original Speakership or his more recent debacle of allowing staff to threaten redistricting as retribution for those who fail to support him. Under Straus we saw more liberal legislation passed than under the last Democratic Speaker and it is well known that he was the Democratic pick, not the conservative choice the first time around. Nothing in his record can mitigate these circumstances. He must go. Support for Straus must not be tolerated by any citizen interested in seeing the size, scope, and price-tag of government shrink.
But enter Ken Paxton! Now here is a guy we should get behind. He’s only been there for seven years which means he may still have retained some perspective. In his time there he has received 100% ratings from both the Heritage Alliance on Social Issues and Texans for Fiscal Responsibility. There is a rumor going around that two more hats will be thrown into this ring; all I can say is they’ll have to be pretty good to outshine Ken Paxton in light of the Tea Party’s priorities.
Three men now vie for the House Gavel in Austin: Joe Straus who seeks to continue his reign, Warren Chisum, a 21-year veteran, and Ken Paxton, a relative new-comer elected in 2003. Paxton has the most conservative record of all, respecting not only family values but liberty as well, an unfortunately rare combination in the RINO-infested Republican party.
Regardless of who wins the Speaker’s race in Texas, the real battle will be between the People and the Politicos. With the revelation by Representative Bryan Hughes that he had been threatened by one of Straus’s staff, voters are reminded that just because the players have changed doesn’t mean the game will be played any differently. Though support for Straus seems to be falling like a rock, there are many in Austin who will continue to support him whether out of fear or self-interest.
The eyes of the grassroots are on the incoming Freshmen, many of whom were elected to replace exactly the sort of good ‘ol boy we would expect to vote for Straus. The momentum is clearly in the direction of smaller government, a radical reduction in spending and massive tax reforms. The People are wanting to see some serious guts on display in Austin this session; the kind of guts that tell Washington to go pound sand.
This race for Speaker may turn out to be more a referendum on who the Tea Parties helped to elect than a referendum on the Speaker. We all know Straus is a disaster who wheedled his way into the seat by collaborating with some RINOs to give the Democrats their pick. What we don’t know is whether these newly elected Freshmen – sent with a clear mandate to destroy politics as usual – will be courageous enough to vote for a Speaker who will allow the radical agenda of restoring liberty to proceed, or will they lose this first skirmish and vote out of fear or expedience?